Independent Film & Media Arts Group (IMAG): National Field Meeting

Co-hosted by BAVC Media and National Endowment for the ArtsThis IMAG virtual meeting is part of a quarterly series offering a national forum for ideas exchange, peer learning, and technical assistance to deepen connectivity between existing independent film and media arts networks, organizations, and collectives across the United States. Intended for those working to strengthen communities through the power of storytelling or build accessible and equitable career pathways into the film and media arts industry, this meeting is suitable for individual artists, arts collectives and networks, arts and non-arts organizations, arts service organizations, industry leaders, arts educators, local/regional/state arts entities and beyond!

Quick Study: April 18, 2024

Jo Reed: Welcome to Quick Study. I’m Josephine Reed. This is the monthly podcast from the National Endowment for the Arts, where we’ll share stats and stories to help us better understand the value of art in everyday life. Sunil Iyengar is the pilot of Quick Study, and he’s the Director of Research and Analysis here at the Arts Endowment. Good morning, Sunil.Sunil Iyengar: Good morning, Jo.Jo Reed: Okay, what’s on your docket for today?Sunil Iyengar:  Well, you and I have had several episodes now where we’ve talked about the role of the arts in health, and we’ve described studies dealing with individual or community well-being associated with the arts, or even such emergent phenomena as social prescribing. We’ve also talked recently about the Surgeon General’s interest in how the arts can help to combat social isolation and loneliness.Jo Reed: Yes, and this has clearly been a priority for our Chair, Maria Rosario-Jackson.Sunil Iyengar: Indeed, but we’ve really rarely, if ever, looked at what other countries, outside maybe the U.S. and the U.K., are doing when it comes to infusing some of this research into cultural practice and policy. So today, I was hoping we could dive into a report by a membership group called the Global Cultural Districts Network. The network, or GCDN, was launched more than a decade ago by the firm AEA Consulting. It’s come along quite a bit, and now they’ve engaged the freelance author Rosie Dow to produce a substantial report titled Culture for Health, Implications and Opportunities for Cultural Districts.Jo Reed: That sounds really interesting to me. What countries are they examining?Sunil Iyengar: So members of the Global Cultural Districts Network, according to their website, run to 57 or so districts, several in the U.S., of course, but also in Canada, the Caribbean, the U.K., parts of Europe, Asia, Australia, and the Middle East, all various sites on those continents. Membership is defined as organizations who are responsible for, quote, “conceiving, funding, building, operating areas and cities with a significant cultural element.”Jo Reed: How are they defining cultural districts?Sunil Iyengar: Well, we’re obviously familiar with that term here at the NEA, right, where municipalities or neighborhoods or community organizations work with artists and designers and maybe preservation societies to designate spaces for historic purposes or for arts and entertainment venues or for cultural tourism. Our Creative Placemaking Grants Program for Our Town, for example, supports many of these, as do grants we make to local arts agencies, for example, or through funding that goes through state and regional arts agencies. In terms of the GCDN, they don’t offer a hard and fast definition of cultural districts. Instead, they say that cultural districts function in, quote, “a wide range of geographies and operational realities, and they often have unique place-based relationships with societal, environmental, and economic issues they seek to address.” I know that all sounds fairly abstract.Jo Reed: Yeah, it kind of does, but I get it. Go on.Sunil Iyengar: Yeah, so to begin with, this report came about because the network was presented with research findings by Daisy Fancourt, an epidemiologist at University College London and her team. I’ve spoken with, here, on this podcast about some of Dr. Fancourt’s work before. Through the analysis of long longitudinal data sets and from a scoping review she did for the World Health Organization, she’s arrived at conclusions that form the starting point for this new report. Those conclusions, according to the GCDN, are threefold. One, targeted arts projects for certain groups may help improve people’s mental health. Two, engaging in arts and culture in the broadest sense is linked to better mental and physical health across the lifespan. The third principle that they derive from her work is there are currently significant social, economic, and demographic barriers and inequalities in people’s access to arts and culture.Jo Reed: Can you back up just a bit, because you say that this report about cultural districts uses those findings as a starting point. Can you explain how they did this?Sunil Iyengar: Sure. Back in May of last year, the network held a series of focus groups around the UK study findings, and they unpacked what those findings mean for cultural districts worldwide. Most of the reactions were positive. Participating cultural district leaders saw real value in organizing their work more strategically within a public health framework. But I thought I’d highlight a few of the network’s observations that I found slightly different than what might have been expected. They are, in brief, some points of tension.Jo Reed: Before you go on, can you give me an example of who would be considered a cultural district leader?Sunil Iyengar: Yes. When I use the term, I refer to policymakers, planners, and executives who the network says come from widely different “international contexts, all working at the intersection of culture and sustainable urban development,” in their words. So that’s what I mean by cultural district leader. It’s not always the same type of individual because many of these districts are organized in different ways and supported in different ways. But, anyway, about the points of tension I was referring to, although many arts and cultural district leaders felt their contributions already to be linked in some way with greater public health, and even though other leaders said they now may think of moving in this direction, there was some potential discomfort with narratives that support the idea that the arts must have benefit, that’s a direct quote, such as health.Jo Reed: I see. So they’re concerned about the arts being only for arts’ sake.Sunil Iyengar: Yeah, somewhat. I mean, it’s an age-old policy question, whether it’s enough to champion the so-called intrinsic value of the arts, Jo. According to this report, there may have been some wariness among cultural district leaders in assuming that the arts always have to have a measurable benefit for people, whether we’re talking about education, employment, the economy or, indeed, health. In fact, some focus group members expressed the sentiment that the UK research results being so strong, it might be possible for arts and cultural districts to go on doing what they’re doing without deliberately addressing public health in their own strategies and still kind of reap the overall benefit in terms of well-being for communities.Jo Reed: That’s interesting. What else did they say?Sunil Iyengar: Well, another area of inquiry for the focus groups was communications. What role should cultural districts play in messaging the plausible health benefits of their work to policymakers and the public? I think there was some recognition here that any argument positing that, quote, all arts are good for health casts the net too wide and may require more resource-intensive partnerships or research investments to back up such claims. Now, the case might be different if the cultural district is pursuing a specific health outcome or aiming to service a specific health condition or population, but in general, the report describes some focus group participants feeling that an arts-and-health frame may divert fundraising from core activities of the district. They pointed out that often the funding they receive will cover only short-term projects, so it may even be irresponsible of them to tackle something as broad as positive health outcomes for an entire community without being able to operate in a longer time frame.Jo Reed: Oh, I can see that because it takes time, a lot of time, for some of these changes to come about, to be able to measure them.Sunil Iyengar: That’s certainly right, as we know from research. This concern leads into another one. This is an almost existential question for us in cultural policy and arts funding, which is how to provide long-term support that aligns with the types of systems change that may be necessary, not only to achieve positive outcomes for a community, but also to broaden access to arts participation. Focus group participants stressed how capital investments for buildings and physical structures can often be easier than this kind of change. City policymakers can be crucial for these undertakings, but at the same time, cultural district leaders have expressed frustration at having to navigate changing political winds when having to affect systems change. On the other hand, there can also be clear risks in courting private developers for such projects since profit motives must take the upper hand in those cases. So that all complicates the work of cultural district leaders, certainly.Jo Reed: Yeah, I can absolutely see that. I wonder if the report features any examples of cultural districts where this work is done in an innovative way, for example.Sunil Iyengar: Yeah, the report, and this is one of the nice things, is the report does include many little examples of how cultural districts are trying to broaden access to arts participation as part of public health. One I liked was how in Munich, Germany, something called cultural passport is given to everyone when they turn 18, which provides free access to cultural events. Now, according to some focus group participants, even this example and others where free access is given for arts attendance raised questions as to whether people will spend time with the arts long or deeply if they don’t pay for it. There was also talk about how to, quote, “balance breadth and depth in subsidizing access to arts participation.” So maybe there’s more questions here than answers, but I really think the report makes you think about these matters in a helpful way.Jo Reed: I agree, but I have questions about that because I know when I go to a museum, for example, or a gallery, after 90 minutes, it’s almost as though I stopped seeing. I’ve taken in as much as I possibly can. And at the same time, we’re privileged to live in Washington DC where so many of the museums are free– and it’s a real joy to pop in to look at one painting for 20 minutes.Sunil Iyengar: Definitely– you’re not going to hear me oppose that strategy, but, I will say that even just going back to research, there does seem to be value that spills over in other forms of arts participation. Years ago, there’s been a term coined, the omnivore theory of arts participation, that people who engage in one form of art and do it intensively may very well see the value and may just gravitate to other art forms and other ways of engaging with the arts. Certainly, if you have, it seems to me, a smorgasbord of opportunities in any given district, there’s almost a more equals more theory, right?. I don’t know if that sounds circular, but, certainly, it’s helpful to think about this conversation about breadth versus depth, and I’m glad they raised it in the report.Jo Reed: I agree. So you’re right: so many more questions, but we like that. We like those questions.Sunil Iyengar: Right. What would we do for a podcast otherwise?Jo Reed: Exactly. Sunil, thank you so much. And I’ll talk to you next time.Sunil Iyengar: Great, Jo, thanks.Jo Reed: That was Sunil Iyengar. He’s the Director of Research and Analysis here at the National Endowment for the Arts. You’ve been listening to Quick Study. The music is We Are One from Scott Holmes Music. It’s licensed through Creative Commons. Until next month, I’m Josephine Reed. Thanks for listening.

FY25 Media Arts Grants for Arts Projects Application Q&ASession 2

Join Media Arts staff from the National Endowment for the Arts for an office hours-style session. Please register in advance.After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.Closed captioning will be available. Should you need other reasonable accommodations, please send your request to events@arts.gov by Tuesday, July 2nd.

FY25 Media Arts Grants for Arts Projects Application Q&A Session 1

Join Media Arts staff from the National Endowment for the Arts for an office hours-style session. Please register in advance.After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.Closed captioning will be available. Should you need other reasonable accommodations, please send your request to mediaarts@arts.gov by Tuesday, June 4th.

Unveiling the Legacy of Hazel Scott: A Conversation with Filmmaker Nicole London

Nicole London. Photo by Burroughs Lamar 

Emmy Award-winning and Grammy-nominated producer and director Nicole London’s journey into the world of filmmaking was unconventional yet deeply rooted in her profound connection to media. As London reflected on her path, she said, “I actually wasn’t drawn to the world of filmmaking so much as I was drawn to the world of television!” Initially pursuing a pre-med major in college, London’s fascination with television led her to broadcasting school in Baltimore, Maryland. Her trajectory took a pivotal turn when she ventured into the realm of documentary filmmaking, inspired by her experience as a personal assistant to a seasoned filmmaker.London has carved out her own filmmaking path through her work on documentary films, such as The Black Panthers: Vanguard of the Revolution, which earned an Exceptional Merit In Documentary Filmmaking Emmy nomination in 2016. She served as the producer for Miles Davis: Birth of the Cool, receiving a Grammy nomination for Best Music Film in 2020 and winning the 2021 News & Documentary Emmy for Outstanding Arts and Culture Documentary. In 2021, London’s contributions were recognized at the 22nd Annual African American Women In Cinema Film Festival, where she was honored as a Trailblazer.When asked about her own mission statement as a filmmaker, London said, “to illuminate the Black experience in all its myriad forms, to provoke thought and inspire action.” With these guiding principles, London embarked on her latest endeavor, directing the upcoming National Endowment for the Humanities- and NEA-supported documentary The Disappearance of Miss Scott, featured on the Public Broadcasting Service television series American Masters.Hazel Scott (1920-1981) is an unsung icon of Hollywood and a trailblazer in her own right. London’s decision to direct the documentary was fueled by a desire to bring Scott’s legacy to light. “It’s shocking that a film hasn’t been done about Hazel Scott before,” London said. “Here is a true maverick—a woman who was one half of what arguably was the first Black power couple, a virtuoso pianist, a trailblazer in film and on the performance stage, the first Black woman to host her own television show, an often-solo crusader for civil rights, a defiant challenger to the smears of McCarthyism. Who wouldn’t want to be the first to commit her story to film?”

Studio still of Hazel Scott in the movie Rhapsody in Blue. Photo by Warner Bros.

As London delved into the creative process—seeking out individuals who knew Scott personally, including relatives—she aimed to capture the breadth and impact of Scott’s life and achievements. “I especially hope her story emboldens young Black women and all women to stand up for themselves in every field, to keep kicking open doors for their sisters to follow through,” she said.

Tammy Kernodle (left) and Thomas Kaufman (right) on the set of The Disappearance of Miss Scott. Photo by Nicole London

With the documentary currently in post-production, London shared that the most important lesson she took from Scott’s legacy was “the way Hazel Scott used her platform and influence to advocate for social justice and civil rights. The fact that she most often stood alone in the fight—that was so powerful to me. That ability to remain resilient and overcome obstacles, it’s an example to draw strength from.” Looking ahead, London envisions the film as a catalyst—for works from future Broadway shows to biopics—for broader recognition and exploration of Scott’s life.For aspiring filmmakers who are creating their own lane, London shared the following three pieces of advice: “Embrace discomfort, refrain from comparing journeys, and above all, keep going.”

Suzan-Lori Parks

Music Credits: “NY” composed and performed by Kosta T, from the cd Soul Sand, used courtesy of the Free Music PodcastJo Reed: From the National Endowment for the Arts, this is Art Works, I’m Josephine ReedSuzan-Lori Parks: I tell people that with “Sally & Tom”, that I put two things I love very much, history, specifically American history, and theater, and I put them in a super collider and it’s like a smash up, mash up. Boom! And we see what happens, and it’s a lot of fun. We’ve been having a lot of fun with the show. Jo Reed: Oh, there are moments that are truly, truly funny and then moments that are absolutely not, and you juggled that so well. Suzan-Lori Parks: Thank you. Jo Reed: Today, we dive into the world of theater, history, and the act of creation through the lens of the MacArthur Fellow and Pulitzer-Prize winning playwright Suzan-Lori Parks or SLP who has a unique ability to intertwine the complexities of American history with the vibrant energy of theater, creating works that challenge, entertain, and provoke thought. And this is particularly true of her current play “Sally and Tom” now having its New York premiere at the Public Theater where SLP is playwright in residence.  A meta play about a theater company putting on a play about Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson, “Sally and Tom” is a fascinating exploration of theater, history, and the power of storytelling, and it exemplifies SLP’s talent for sparking nuanced conversations about America’s past and present. I had the enormous pleasure of speaking with Suzan-Lori Parks and I began our conversation by asking her to tell us a little more about “Sally and Tom.” Suzan-Lori Parks: Sure, let’s see, if I get it right. “Sally & Tom” concerns a theater troupe, a low budget, no budget theater troupe. They call themselves Good Company. They’re putting on a play about Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson. Sally Hemings, of course, being, among other things, the mother of seven children, and also one of the enslaved people owned by Thomas Jefferson, one of our great founding fathers, who was also a brilliant writer, and an architect also. But yeah, so they’re putting on a play. One of the things it’s about, we could say, is, well, there’s a lot of love in the play, “Sally & Tom”, but the story of Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson is not your traditional love story. There’s love there, but the play, “Sally & Tom”, really takes a look at how we have a lot of joy when we are making things, or as I say in a note, how we are making the stuff that nightmares are made on. So there’s a lot of fun in the play. There’s a lot of joy. There’s a lot of love. There’s a lot of love between the characters, but it’s not your traditional “Everybody, hurrah, America!” It’s let’s celebrate America. Let’s really celebrate America. Let’s respect America. Let’s take another look at America with love, with devotion, and there are a lot of tough conversations you got to have when you’re loving someone or something, and that’s what we’re having in “Sally & Tom.”. Jo Reed: Well, the play absolutely deals with very difficult and fraught issues; enslavement and its traces still on this country, a man with an enlightened philosophy who actually can live with owning people.  There’s rape, there’s sexual consent, and there’s the coexistence, but very different experiences of a Black family and a white family who are living together. But you insist on a nuanced conversation about all of this, even as you focus like a laser on the facts of the case. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes. I think nuanced conversations, the ability to have nuanced conversations will be our salvation as a culture, really. If we haven’t been working those muscles, maybe they’ve gotten a little slack, because we’ve had our gadgets in our hands too much, or all you’ve been lifting is the remote, some of you. But I do think that the ability to develop the nuanced conversation, that’s going to really, really be the thing that allows us to move forward as a world culture, as a universal culture. Just the ability to listen, the ability to hear, the ability to say the things that need to be said, the ability to invite people to the table, the ability to invite people to the table, the ability to see yourself in a new light, to extend your hand, whether it’s to someone that you’d call the other, or someone across the aisle, or someone across a crowded room, those kind of just basic human skills, people. Yes, in “Sally & Tom”, we practice them all. The Good Company, the theater troupe practices them, not without difficulty. And the folks in 1790 also practiced them, yeah. Jo Reed: Yeah, no one ever said it was easy. Suzan-Lori Parks: No. Jo Reed: One thing I just loved is that there are, what, eight performers? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes, there are eight performers. Jo Reed: Every one of them, even the ones who don’t have that much stage time, they’re all so vivid. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes. Jo Reed: That’s a combination of your writing and their performances. That’s wonderful. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, so we have the best actors in the universe, and “Sally & Tom” is a play where each character, no matter what their station is, their station in life, whether they’re the lead or the not lead, each character has a journey, a very significant journey. Each character receives an invitation to the table, if you will, is allowed in the room, gets to have a series of moments. It’s the practice of inclusivity, and that’s what it looks like. It just makes everything so much more vibrant and beautiful, in life as in theater. In life as in art. Jo Reed: And that certainly–Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes, sorry. It’s–Jo Reed: No, not at all. It certainly felt that way in the audience. Suzan-Lori Parks: Oh, yay.Jo Reed: You have three powerful monologues in this play. Suzan-Lori Parks: Thank you. Jo Reed: By Thomas, by James, who’s Sally’s brother, and a valet to Thomas Jefferson, and is also an enslaved person. And then finally, Sally herself. They’re very different. They’re very interesting. With James, he’s talking to Thomas Jefferson. Whereas Sally and Thomas are talking to us, the audience, I think. Talk about that, and creating those monologues. Which one did you start with? Suzan-Lori Parks: My writing is very much a spiritual practice. So the person who let me in was Thomas Jefferson. Thomas Jefferson let me in.  He was the first one that I wrote. His monologue isn’t the first one in the play. But to be able to see him, see beyond the carved-in-stone monument that so many of us– we revere him, we respect him, and we only see him in this one kind of way, a lot of us. Others only see him in another kind of way, the “Ah, how could he do such things?” There’s truth in both aspects of him, and that’s what makes him, I think, an interesting character, and a character worth listening to. So he speaks a lot about his achievements, and his talents, and his skills, and his curiosities. I mean, he’s a man who remodeled, he says, almost every house he lived in. Putting a dome on Monticello was one of his achievements. Also, he’s a very great writer. That’s something. But the monologue doesn’t stop there. It also talks about the depth of his emotion, which he, in the monologue, talks about being literally at sea, surrounded by nothing but water, surrounded by nothing but tears. This is a different way to look at Thomas Jefferson. In “Sally & Tom”, we don’t only humanize the enslaved people. We also humanize the people who owned slaves. Both things are happening. Jo Reed: Yeah, when I was in the theater, I was thinking of the Jefferson quote, “When I think that God is just, I fear for my country.”  You don’t quote that exactly, but that’s really explored, I think, in that monologue. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah. Rightfully so, he is proud of his accomplishments and reminds us that he is at the great intersection of the way we see our country, and that’s very important. Then, of course, Sally’s, I think, monologue I wrote next, her monologue comes at the end of the play. In a way, she’s remembering things about her life in the sort of spiritual tradition of you remember things, you bring the body back together, literally remembering things, and you remember things in a way to, she says, “Cast the burden.” It’s a spiritual activity of casting the burden. Meaning recalling things as a way to let them go. We say in spiritual conversations, “I cast the burden and I set myself free.” The contemporary characters quote more than once the esteemed scholar and educator, Mary McLeod Bethune, who says “Forgiveness is not forgetting, it’s letting go of the hurt.” So we’re not talking about covering up anything or papering over anything. We’re talking about recalling things so that we can let them go and move forward as a people, as a country, as a group of folks. And then James’s speech, I think I wrote last, but it comes first in the play, and it’s a great point of examination and contention for both the characters in 1790, and the characters in the contemporary day. Because the question of his speech, which is eloquent and passionate and gorgeous, and he says all the things that need to be said to the man, to Thomas Jefferson. And yet the question in “Sally & Tom” is, is there a place for that kind of talking in our world? Jo Reed: That brings us very nicely to the fact that this is meta theatrical.   So let’s talk about what that allowed you to do. I think that speech is a perfect example of that. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, we’re writing a play about writing a play. James Baldwin, the great scholar, writer, activist, James Baldwin. I had the great fortune of studying creative writing with him at Hampshire College. I was at Mount Holyoke College as an undergrad. In the early ‘80s, Mr. Baldwin taught creative writing at Hampshire College. I took what he said was his first creative writing class he ever taught. There I was with 14 other students around a library-sized table, learning, as I say, how to conduct myself in the presence of the spirit, how to pay attention, how to show up. One of his wonderful things he would say in his writing is: “We are trapped in history and history is trapped in us.” So, a play that’s about playwriting and a play that’s about playmaking, “Sally & Tom”, to me, is very much about how the world is made. Like Shakespeare, “All the world’s a stage.” Or Hamlet would say, “hold a mirror up to nature”. So, writing a play about playwriting, I’m really engaging in a conversation about how the world is made. As Luce says late in the play, “We’re making the world, we’re not just living in it.” How each character in the play, how each of us as human beings in the world, how we make the world every day through our actions, how the characters in “Sally & Tom” are making the world every moment through their actions. Some things are scripted, some are not. Some things need to be re-scripted because of things that happen. What that allows for the characters in the play is to perhaps discover some trapdoor. So instead of just history being trapped in them and them being trapped in history, the meta-theatricality of the play allows for us to find trapdoors, us to find ways out, us to find crossroads of compassion, us to find clearings where we can dance and sing or weep, as the whatever the new– places where we can find freedom, where we can claim freedom, where we can celebrate history. That’s not just saying “Yay, yay, yay! It’s all good!” You celebrate history by falling on your knees and weeping, and that’s okay. We have to embrace those kinds of moments in our culture. It’s okay to weep. It’s okay to say “Gee, I was great, but I might not be as great as I might’ve been.” To respect yourself enough to look again at yourself, to rehearse, re-hear your own words. All that has happened in the play. It’s a lot, but it’s fun! It’s fun. Jo Reed: All props to the director, because everybody is embodying multiple characters, and at the same time, it’s always very clear who’s who on that stage. Suzan-Lori Parks: Oh, thank you, Josephine. It’s Steve H. Broadnax III. We call him SHB3, is a brilliant director. This is the first time we’ve worked together. We worked together initially at the Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis when we did “Sally & Tom” there a couple of years ago. That’s where we had the world premiere. I’m so thrilled to be in collaboration with Steve H. Broadnax. Of course, he’s done “Thoughts of a Colored Man” on Broadway. He’s very esteemed. He is such a joy to work with, and when it’s game time, brother Broadnax comes in and says “Okay, everybody, it’s game time!” Everybody knows what that means. So, there can be a joy in making, in pursuing excellence and in attaining excellence, and that’s what we do every day in the room.Jo Reed: I was going to say, and a joy in paying attention. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, right? There is a joy in paying attention. There is a joy in showing up. The first award I got as a child, I was in either kindergarten or first grade. Anyway, I still have the little plaque that they gave me. It was for perfect attendance, and I love that. I have the little plaque on my bookshelf, “Perfect attendance.” I said “Yeah, that’s what I’m going to be doing. I’m going to be showing up.” Jo Reed: Well, collaboration is so key in theater and I’m just curious how the collaboration worked with the director and with the actors in “Sally & Tom”? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes. In “Sally & Tom”, Steve and I worked very closely together. In the rehearsal room, of course, I defer to him when he’s giving direction to an actor because he is highly skilled in the language, in transmitting the text to the actors, the blocking to the actors, what the set will look like, all those wonderful things. I oftentimes stand by his elbow and say “Hey, could we try this? Shall we try this?” He’ll communicate that to the actor because that’s the most effective way to help them understand it. And yet, I’ve got a million and one ideas about things. I mean, we say we get in each other’s lanes all the time. So I’ll have ideas about staging and all that kind of thing that are transmitted and that you see on stage, and he has plenty of ideas about the text, and you’ll see in the text. One day, he and I were talking, and I said “Oh, I want to articulate what Good Company is trying to do. They’re trying to reach a wider audience.” He said “A whiter audience?!” We laughed, we burst out laughing. I said “Steve, it’s going in the play!” So we put it in the play and now it’s in a scene with Luce and Mike, and it’s a really funny moment. But also, the actors, you’ll see a moment in the play, in “Sally & Tom”, where the actors are throwing ideas into the pot. Good Company’s throwing ideas in the pot. That happened, plenty of times, I would make a joke, like “What you say might end up in the play.” That happened less. But in terms of overall, the structure, the main story, the bones, the basic architecture is very much my responsibility. I delight in that. There is a hierarchy. Collaboration’s great and there is a hierarchy. Sometimes people would be talking, and I’m like “Quiet please, the writer is in the room, and the writer is writing.” So, things like that, but it’s all understood. I also don’t jump on stage and perform for them. I would ask them to do something. So it’s collaboration with an understanding of what your department is, what my department is, what your lane is, what my lane is. Jo Reed: These characters live in your head, and they live on the page. Can you tell me about that moment when you actually see them embodied on the stage? Suzan-Lori Parks: It’s an absolute joy. So far in my career, I have not been one of those writers who– I mean, I talk to some of my friends and colleagues, they’re disappointed: “Oh, it’s not as good as I had in my head.” For me, so far, I have been the opposite; it’s always a lot better than I imagine in my head. I mean, the costumes! I think I wrote this play for the costumes, really. Every character has a really pretty costume. No, that’s silly. Of course, I didn’t. But at the same time, I did write in the script, notes to the design. One character, Maggie, says “Because my costume is killer.” So that was a note, a hint to production that we wanted awesome costumes, which Rodrigo definitely gives us some of the most beautiful outfits. It’s just so much better than I had in my head, of course, because the actors are so great, and the set is beautiful. I sat watching the show yesterday afternoon and was just so pleased and happy for the company that we have managed to get the show to this beautiful, beautiful place. Jo Reed: I’d like to just briefly touch on your relationship with music, because there’s such musicality in your language. I mean, in this conversation, certainly in your work, and you’ve written music. Your play, “Plays for the Plague Year”, what did you write, 25 songs for it? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, “Plays for the Plague Year”, what a joy that was. We premiered, world premiere at Joe’s Pub last year, I guess it was? We won the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Music in a Play. Yeah, I wrote 20, 25 songs for it. Maybe we actually performed maybe 20. Words and music, I write. I have a band called Sula and the Joyful Noise, and we are performing all around town, and out of town too. We were a six-piece band with a horn section. I was a songwriter before I was a playwright. Jo Reed: That’s what I was going to ask you. Did music come first? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, music came first. In my experience, writing was a safer space, we could say, than the world of music. So I ended up gravitating more toward just writing plays and novels and things like that, and then have in the past 20 years, or 15 years, allowed myself to step back into my songwriter space, and I’m having a wonderful time. Working with musicians is very different. Being in a band, having my horn section, and my husband’s a bass player, and we’ve got drums and a vibraphone player. It’s intense. It’s very different from being the playwright sitting in the house giving notes, that kind of thing.Jo Reed: I bet, yeah. Can you tell me just a little bit about your background, where you’re from? Suzan-Lori Parks: Sure. My dad was in the army. He was a career army officer. It’s funny, my mom just told me recently, he joined the army in ROTC. He came from a very economically disadvantaged situation, and the army had just been integrated. That was the only way he was going to get to college. He wanted badly to go to college, and the family, his family did not have any kind of money. So he joined the ROTC as a way to get to college. So he graduated from college and then was a career army officer. My mom was a college professor, sociology, and later, oral history. We moved all around the country. We lived in Germany for a good amount of time. My parents, in their wisdom, they sent me to German school. All the American kids are going to American school, they sent me and my brother to German school. Not only were we the only Black kids in the school, but we had to learn German, which came in handy, of course, as learning a language always does. Also, because now my husband is German, so we speak German around the house. But that’s it. Jo Reed: How did you get involved in playwriting? Suzan-Lori Parks: So there I was studying creative writing with James Baldwin in this creative writing class in the early ‘80s. As people know, in a creative writing class, it will be your turn to present your work. Usually, the students would sit at the table and very brilliantly read in a modest voice their works. For some reason, and I don’t know why, but I would always read like this, “And then she ran across the field, and she picked up the cotton candy, and she said ‘Oh my God!’.” I would be doing that. I do not know why. Maybe because I was a singer songwriter who wasn’t singing songs, but I was kind of singing the song. But anyway, I would perform my short stories, and at one point after class, Mr. Baldwin said “Miss. Parks, have you ever thought about writing for the theater?” I was like “No, sir, I haven’t.” In my mind, in my little tummy, I thought “Oh no, he’s trying to tell me that I suck as a writer.” Because it’s like “Get me to a theater!” That kind of thing. I thought “Oh no!” Because I didn’t like theater, what I knew of theater, again, it was the ‘80s, it was all the people I knew who did theater, I was at Mount Holyoke College, and they were all from New York City, and they all talked like this, “Oh darling, darling, darling.” They were all from New York City. So there was a lot of faking going on. There was a lot of affect, and a lot of “Ugh,” this kind of behavior. I was like “I am not like that. I’m real. I like real things! ,” like that. So I didn’t think the theater was a place for me. Although, riding the bus home that evening back to my dorm, I started writing my first play, because I thought “Well, it’s Mr. Baldwin. It’s James Baldwin. I might as well give it a try.” It’s like I’m still trying my hand at writing for the theater. It’s just continued. So that’s how I got into it, yeah. Jo Reed: Well, yeah, it’s interesting because, okay, so with “Plays for the Plague Year”, 25 songs, it’s like a theatrical concert. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes.Jo Reed: We have the meta play going on with “Sally & Tom”, and then you did “365 Plays / 365 Days”, a play a day for a year. It’s almost like you’re continually creating new structures for your work. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes. Strange, isn’t it? Yeah, no, thank you for acknowledging that. Yeah, for “Plays for the Plague Year”, yeah, I just sat down and wrote a play a day as a way to just– I wanted us to have something with which we could celebrate when we got back together. When I started writing those plays, of course, we were all in lockdown. Getting back together was not a sure thing. But I felt like “Well, I’ll write something and then when we get back together, we’ll have a song to sing together,” if you will. A song of days, all the days. I would just listen to the news, or read the news, or whatever, and write a play about something that caught my eye. Yes, and as you pointed out, it was very much like in 2002, I guess it was, when I started and I wrote a play a day for a year. That was just as a way to say thank you to theater, because it had given me so much. I’d won the Pulitzer Prize several months before, and I was just saying “Thank you,” by just showing up. Again, attendance, perfect attendance. Showing up every day and writing a little play as a way to say thank you. With “Plays for the Plague Year”, it was showing up every day as a way to say “Attitude of gratitude while we’re in this difficult place.” Anytime I would write a song, I would throw it in. I wrote a song when I heard that Chadwick Boseman died. I wrote a song for Chadwick Boseman called “R.I.P. The King”. Or a song when John Lewis died, as the mourners crossed the Pettus Bridge with his casket, they shouted “We got it from here.” So I wrote a song called “We Got It from Here”. Or there was a song for John Prine I wrote, because he also passed away during that time. So, songs would come up like that and I’d just throw them in, and not even knowing if we’d ever come back together. And then we came back together, Oskar Eustis at the Public Theater said “Well, why don’t you put them on?” I said “Really?” He said “Sure! You wrote a part for the writer, why don’t you be the writer?” I’m like “Oh, okay.” So there I was in Joe’s Pub performing the play,five, six nights a week with a wonderful group of actors. Directed by Nigel Smith. Great direction. Great to work with Nigel Smith.. Jo Reed: I mean, your whole career is extraordinary, but you’ve really had a couple of extraordinary years. Suzan-Lori Parks: Thank you.Jo Reed: “Topdog/Underdog”, your Pulitzer Prize winning play, was recently revived on Broadway. What a revival that was. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes, what a joy. Again, another director, another wonderful director, Kenny Leon, and two brilliant and beautiful and generous and kind and loving actors, Corey Hawkins and Yahya Abdul-Mateen II. Just splendid, splendid brothers. Righteous brothers. The kind of actors that you want to work with. I would sit in rehearsal,  when we got into the Golden Theatre, which is a beautiful theater on Broadway, I would shout in rehearsal, they were doing the play, and I’d go “Sing the song!” like that. Because they were up there, so brilliant, so wonderful, so inclusive, because it’s a play about two dudes in a room. But they were just very inclusive to my thoughts and my contributions, not just because I was the writer, but because they value the opinion of women, which is a great thing in a man, yeah. Jo Reed: You were the first African-American woman to win a Pulitzer Prize for drama back in 2002. I’m wondering, when you think about it, when you think about the past 22 years, what changes you’ve observed in theater? Suzan-Lori Parks: I mean, fortunately for world culture, I think it’s become more inclusive. I think it’s become more diverse. These words are sometimes hot-button issues and triggering for people, on both sides of the aisle, if you will. I think the spirit is generous and loving and encourages inclusion, even when it’s difficult, and encourages respect, and encourages understanding, and encourages kindness. These are the truths that I hold to be self-evident. Show up, be kind, don’t save your kindness for just the higher ups. Kindness should be shared and spread, and it’s not easy to do every day. But anyway, so I do think that theater has become more open and engaging and more joyous, and it also is allowing us to take a look at some things that perhaps we haven’t had a chance to look at yet. Inviting in the voices of, we would say, underserved communities. There are plays on Broadway…. well, last year, you can see “The Thanksgiving Play”, or “Fat Ham”, or alongside  “The Piano Lesson”, and “Death of a Salesman”, and  “Good Night, Oscar.”  So there’s a whole wonderful offering. I mean, and this is just me, but I think that the world is hungry for daily bread, meaning sustenance, meaning food that feeds you in a deep way, and not just cash money bread. I would ask theater, as we continue to be inclusive and expansive, not just to go for the cash money bread, the entertainment dollars, but also to find ways to continue to innovate, and find ways where we can offer audiences daily bread, and not to abandon the offering of daily bread in the pursuit of cash money bread. In a way, to bring it back to “Sally & Tom”, that’s one thing that begins to happen with Good Company. The play that they’re performing is originally called “E Pluribus Unum”, “Out of Many, One.” The producer doesn’t like the title so much. The writer, Luce, lands on a title that’s more appealing all around, to herself included, which is called “Pursuit of Happiness”. So the understanding of “Out of Many, One” is, I would say, discarded for the endless yearning of “The Pursuit of Happiness”. So it’s just interesting. So I would hope that as theater, as the arts, as the world continues to expand, as the universe continues to expand, that we can find ways to continue to deliver to each other daily bread. Jo Reed: You are a playwright-in-residence at the Public Theater. What does this experience allow you to do? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah. As a human person, I traveled around so much as a kid, and so people say “Where are you from?” Like Johnny Cash, “I’m from everywhere.” But I traveled around so much that I never really felt like I had a home. I mean, always living with, of course, my parents, but never really having a home. I feel like being the writer-in-residence at the Public Theater has allowed me to have an artistic home and to put down roots and to have a seat, in the good way. If we were ever to hang out, Josephine, you’d see, I’m one of those people who does not sit down. I’m always dancing around. I’m always in the back of the theater, dancing around, watching the show. But to take your seat in the way that the scripture or that the books talk about taking your seat and knowing that you have a place that is for you, and the strength that comes from that, and the daring that I’ve continued to exercise, because I have a seat, because I have a chair at the Public Theater, which is a theater coming when I was coming up, I always– like “Wow, it’s the Public Theater.” I still feel that way, “Wow, it’s the Public Theater.” Because so many great artists have come through that theater. I had my first play there in 1994, 30 years ago, when George C. Wolfe was the artistic director of the Public Theater, a show in the Martinson where “Sally and Tom” is now, called “The America Play” about a Lincoln impersonator. A Black man who dressed up as Abraham Lincoln. So that was 30 years ago in the Martinson at the Public Theater with George C. Wolfe as the artistic director. Let’s see, Liz Diamond was the director of that play, and now 30 years later, there is another play about history and America, which features people dressing up as historical characters. It’s my jam, yeah . Jo Reed: Well, one thing you do at the Public Theater is Watch Me Work. Suzan-Lori Parks: Oh, thank you for mentioning that . Jo Reed: Can you explain that and what it is you do and how it works ? Suzan-Lori Parks: Yes, thank you, Josephine. Oh, it’s one of my great joys. Watch Me Work, I started it about 14 years ago. A dramaturg friend of mine who, at that time, worked at the Public Theater, Jesse Cameron Alick, was doing a theater festival, I think on East 4th Street, in some little theaters on East 4th Street. Jesse said “Okay, SLP, I’ve got a lot of plays on the docket already by young writers, and I’d love to include a play by–” and I said “Oh, by an old writer?” We laughed. I said “Okay, man.” I just started talking; it was unscripted. It was a very weird moment. I opened my mouth and I said “Jesse, I do not have time to write a play for you, but I tell you what I’ll do. I’ll sit in front of the audience with my red typewriter, and we will work together for 20 minutes. For the remaining time in the show, I will take questions from them about their creative process, and we will call it Watch Me Work.” It was like something was speaking through me in that moment. So, we started it, in a little theater festival, and then we quickly after that moved into the lobby of the Public Theater. It became a weekly thing, and people would come, just hang out in the lobby of the Public Theater. We would work together for 20 minutes and then I would take questions from them about their creative process. COVID happened, I went online, Public Theater and HowlRound hosted us online on Zoom, and then it was every day. I wanted to do it every single day. During the first months of lockdown when community really needed– so many people needed somewhere to go, and so many people needed to be around other people, and we could not physically be around other people. Everything was closed down. So I just said “Every day we’re going to get online and do Watch Me Work.” We had people from all over the world Zooming in, and  we create a community. After lockdown, we came back from everything. Now we’re back to once a week. Once a week, Mondays, 5:00 P.M., you can sign up through the Public Theater website. What’s great about Watch Me Work is I’ll talk to you in real time about your creative process. You don’t have to be in a university program. You don’t have to be a matriculated student anywhere. You don’t have to live in the United States. All you have to do is have access to some kind of online portal situation. Come on, I’ll talk to you, and I’ll talk to you about your work and your creative process. It’s fun! I love it. I love doing it. Yeah, I’ve been doing it for a long time . Jo Reed: As we’re ending, do have any final thoughts you want to share about “Sally And Tom”Suzan-Lori Parks: I was thinking, things I want to say. We say, in the play, “This is not a love story.” It’s more like a truth and reconciliation story. So, just to give people that as a way to think about it. Also, I’m amazed at how the play, it resonates with all kinds of audiences, but especially younger audiences. We had a group of young partners, they call them at the Public Theater, the other night, and it was like “Whoa!” It was electric. So that’s very moving to me, to know that the transmission is happening. So that was joyful. I think people coming up and coming into their adulthood, or in the first 10, 20 years of their adulthood, are very eager and open in ways that are really valuable to our culture. So I would just encourage that openness, people who are coming up, because we need you. Jo Reed: I think that’s a great place to end it. Thank you so much.Suzan-Lori Parks: Thank you so much, Josephine. This is so fun. What fun! Jo Reed: It was great, thank you. Suzan-Lori Parks: Yeah, thank you. You asked all the right questions.Jo Reed: That was the incomparable playwright Suzan-Lori Parks, we were talking about many things–especially her play “Sally and Tom” which has been extended at the Public Theater through May 5. You can keep up with her at Suzanloriparks.com. We’ll have links in our show notes to her website and to the Public Theater where you can get information about “Sally and Tom” and SLP’s project Watch Me Work.  You’ve been listening to Art Works produced at the National Endowment for the Arts. Follow us wherever you get your podcasts and leave us a rating on Apple—it will help people to find us. For the National Endowment for the Arts, I’m Josephine Reed. Thanks for listening.

NEA Jazz Masters: Tribute to Amina Claudine Myers

From her early beginnings as a member of the Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians (AACM), Amina Claudine Myers has gained acclaim as a skilled composer for voice and instruments, often displaying her gospel influences. Her move to New York City in the 1970s led her to prioritize her compositional work and to take on theatrical production projects.  Myers was born in Blackwell, Arkansas, and was brought up primarily by her great aunt and her great uncle. She started taking piano lessons at the age of six and, when she was seven, her family moved to a Black community in Dallas, Texas, where Myers continued her lessons. The family moved back to Blackwell in 1957 and, soon after, Myers formed a gospel group that toured the local circuit. The recipient of several college scholarships, she majored in music education at Philander Smith College in Little Rock, Arkansas. During this time, she played in the music department jazz band, became student director for the choir, and taught herself to play the organ.After graduation, Myers moved to Chicago, where she taught music at an elementary school for six years. She became a member of AACM in 1966 and was one of the performers at the AACM’s second concert. In the late 1960s, she added “Amina” to her name.As an AACM member, Myers started composing for voice and instruments. Her original compositions incorporated traditional influences, including blues, gospel, and jazz. In 1975, she organized her first voice choir for her musical called “I Dream,” which was first presented in Chicago. After moving to New York City, she premiered her work “Improvisational Suite for Chorus, Pipe Organ and Percussion”(with an ensemble of nineteen: sixteen voices, two percussionists, and Myers on pipe organ) at St. Peter’s Lutheran Church and “When the Berries Fell,” consisting of eight voices, electric organ, piano, and two percussionists, at Manhattan Community College.In New York she wrote for theater, composing music for a number of Off-Broadway productions and even acting in some. She was the assistant musical director for Ain’t Misbehavin’ prior to its Broadway production. She expanded her palette and has created works for dance and for chamber orchestra and chorus as well as works in collaboration with the Chinese composer and vocalist Sola Lui.She has also continued working in the jazz realm, recording and performing with many great jazz artists, including notable tours with Lester Bowie, Charlie Haden’s Liberation Orchestra, and Archie Shepp. She has performed throughout Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and North America, and also held residencies and conducted workshops at colleges and universities nationally and internationally.Myers has received many grants and awards, including the 2021 Living Legacy Award from Mid Atlantic Arts Foundation and grants from the National Endowment for the Arts, Meet the Composer, and New York Foundation for the Arts. She was inducted into the Arkansas Black Hall of Fame in 2001 and the Arkansas Jazz Hall of Fame in 2010. She resides and teaches privately in New York City.Select DiscographyPoems for Piano: The Piano Music of Marion Brown, Sweet Earth, 1979Muhal Richard Abrams, Duet, Black Saint, 1981Women in (E)Motion Festival, Tradition & Moderne, 1988Augmented Variations, Amina C Records, 2005-2008Sama Rou: Songs from My Soul, Amina C Records, 2016

NEA Jazz Masters: Tribute to Willard Jenkins

Willard Jenkins—recipient of the 2024 A.B. Spellman NEA Jazz Masters Fellowship for Jazz Advocacy—has been involved in jazz as a writer, broadcaster, educator, historian, artistic director and arts consultant since the 1970s and is one of the major voices in promulgating the music and its importance to American culture. Currently the artistic director of the DC Jazz Festival as well as the host of the Ancient/Future program on DC’s WPFW radio station, the only jazz station in the nation’s capital, Jenkins is an authority on the local as well as national jazz scene.Jenkins was born in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and grew up in Cleveland, Ohio, in a household that was overflowing with jazz music. He cultivated his own love of the music first through his father’s record collection, then through local jazz radio station WCUY. While at Kent State University earning a BA degree in sociology, Jenkins joined Omega Psi Phi and began writing about jazz for the Black student newspaper and then became a regular contributor to the Cleveland Plain Dealer after graduating. He subsequently contributed to local, regional, national, and international publications with contributions appearing in JazzTimes, Inside Arts, DownBeat, Jazz Forum, and numerous other publications and online sites, as well as providing liner notes for jazz recordings.In 1977, he founded the Northeast Ohio Jazz Society as a concert presenter. From 1979 until 1984, Jenkins taught jazz history at Cleveland State University, and continued his teaching through an online course, Jazz Imagines Africa, for Kent State University, which he taught starting in 2005.In 1983, Jenkins conducted a regional needs assessment/research and feasibility study on jazz in the Midwest, which led to the development of the nation’s first regional jazz service program at Arts Midwest. He went on to work at Arts Midwest until 1989, publishing the quarterly Jazzletter, developing the first regional jazz database, and writing a series of how-to technical assistance booklets for musicians, presenters, educators, and organizations. At Arts Midwest, he also produced the first jazz media conference, which led to development of the Jazz Journalist Association.From 1989 until 1994, Jenkins was executive director of the National Jazz Service Organization in Washington, DC. In 1990, he was an architect of the Lila Wallace-Reader’s Digest National Jazz Network, which received an initial funding allocation of $3.4 million to develop a network of presenting organizations and regional arts organizations.Over the arc of his career, Jenkins has also served as 18-year artistic director of Tri-C JazzFest, BeanTown Jazz Festival, Tribeca Performing Arts Center, and as artistic consultant to the Mid-Atlantic Jazz Festival, 651 Arts, Harlem Stage/Aaron Davis, and the Smithsonian Institution. He also conducted in-depth oral history interviews for the Smithsonian Institution, the Rhythm and Blues Foundation, and Weeksville Heritage Center. In addition to WPFW, Jenkins has served as program host and producer at WWOZ in New Orleans, KFAI in Minneapolis, and BET Jazz.In 2010, he worked with Randy Weston on his highly praised as-told-to autobiography, arranging the material in the book. He writes and edits a blog, The Independent Ear, on his website openskyjazz.com and recently used a collection of interviews he conducted on the blog with Black music critics for his new book, Ain’t But a Few of Us: Black Music Writers Tell Their Story, that was released in late 2022. He also produces and hosts a biweekly online jazz trivia contest called Jazzology for the website Savage Content, for whom he wrote a 13-episode biographical podcast on Billie Holiday, No Regrets.Select Bibliography:Editor, Ain’t But a Few of Us: Black Music Writers Tell Their Story, Duke University Press, 2022Contributor, DC Jazz: Stories of Jazz Music in Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press, 2018Contributor, David Baker: A Legacy in Music, Indiana University Press, 2011Contributor, Ain’t Nothing Like the Real Thing (How the Apollo Theater Shaped American Entertainment), Smithsonian Books, 2010Collaborator, African Rhythms: The Autobiography of Randy Weston, Duke University Press, 2010

NEA Jazz Masters: Tribute to Terence Blanchard

Terence Blanchard has been a consistent artistic force for making powerful musical statements for more than 40 years. From his stint with Art Blakey & the Jazz Messengers to writing scores for Spike Lee and others, he is unique in the jazz world as an artist whose creative endeavors go far beyond the genre into composing music for television and film, conceiving grand operas, and collaborating with dance companies. For these feats, Blanchard has been recognized with a 2018 United States Artists Fellowship, a 2023 Peabody Medal, and seven Grammy Awards. Blanchard is also a passionate educational mentor, having held positions at the Berklee College of Music, the Thelonious Monk Institute of Jazz, and at the University of California, Los Angeles. He has recently been named  the new executive artistic director of SFJAZZ.Blanchard was born and raised in New Orleans, Louisiana. His father, a part-time opera singer, started Blanchard on piano at the age of five and he began learning the trumpet at age eight. At summer camp, he became friends with Wynton and Branford Marsalis and, as a teenager, studied at the New Orleans Center for Creative Arts with Roger Dickerson and Ellis Marsalis. At Rutgers University, he studied under jazz saxophonist Paul Jeffrey and trumpeter Bill Fielder, and toured with the Lionel Hampton Orchestra at the age of 19. In 1982, Wynton Marsalis recommended Blanchard to Art Blakey to take Marsalis’ place in the Jazz Messengers. Blanchard would eventually become the band’s music director.It was in the Jazz Messengers that he met his next collaborator, Donald Harrison, Jr. also from New Orleans. Together they formed Harrison/Blanchard and released seven well-received albums. While still in Blakey’s band, the duo became the first recipients of the Sony Innovators Award.In 1991, Blanchard started his solo career with the release of his self-titled album. The same year he also embarked on a more than 30-year collaboration with Spike Lee, starting as a session musician in Do the Right Thing and Mo’ Better Blues and scoring his first film Jungle Fever. His work with Lee included both films, such as Malcolm X, and documentaries like When the Levees Broke: A Requiem in Four Acts about the devastation of Hurricane Katrina.  His scores for Lee’s BlackKklansman and Da’ 5 Bloods led to two Oscar nominations.In addition to his work with Lee and others, Blanchard has provided music for Broadway plays, dance collaborations, and orchestras. More recently, Blanchard has composed two operas, the most recent of which is Fire Shut Up in My Bones, based on the memoir of celebrated writer and New York Times columnist Charles Blow, with the libretto written by Kasi Lemmons. Commissioned and premiered by Opera Theatre of Saint Louis in 2019, the Metropolitan Opera produced the opera to open their 2021-22 season in New York, making it the first opera composed by an African American composer to premiere at the Met in its entire history.Blanchard continues to perform and record with his band the E-Collective and with the Turtle Island Quartet on the recent recording, Absence, a tribute to Wayne Shorter.Select DiscographyArt Blakey & the Jazz Messengers, New York Scene, Concord, 1984Terence Blanchard/Donald Harrison, Black Pearl, Columbia, 1988Flow, Blue Note 2004A Tale of God’s Will (A Requiem for Katrina), Blue Note, 2007Terence Blanchard, featuring the E-Collective and the Turtle Island Quartet, Absence, Blue Note, 2021

NEA Jazz Masters: Tribute to Gary Bartz

Gary Bartz has been one of the best purveyors of what he calls “informal composition” (as opposed to improvisation) on alto saxophone since the 1960s, working with such luminaries as Max Roach, Charles Mingus, Art Blakey, and Miles Davis. He has released more than 45 solo albums and appears on more than 200 as a guest artist, as well as working with some of the up-and-coming artists in jazz today, such as Ali Shaheed Muhammad and Adrian Younge for their Jazz Is Dead series and the jazz-funk band Maisha.Bartz was born in Baltimore, Maryland, to nightclub-owning parents and was exposed to many great jazz artists who played at their club. He was 6 when he was inspired by the sound of Charlie Parker, and received his first alto saxophone at the age of 11. He attended the Juilliard School in New York City in 1958. He joined the Charles Mingus Jazz Workshop from 1962 to 1964, meeting jazz giants Eric Dolphy and Rahsaan Roland Kirk. He also began working with the Max Roach/Abbey Lincoln group in 1964.In 1965, Bartz was recruited into Art Blakey’s Jazz Messengers while they played at his parents’ club, taking John Gilmore’s position in the band. He made his recording debut with Blakey on Soulfinger that same year.In 1970, Miles Davis asked Bartz to join his band and perform at the historic Isle of Wight Festival and his subsequent tour. Bartz is featured on Davis’ Live/Evil recording. Bartz also formed his own group, NTU Troop, named for the Bantu word for “essence.” The group blended soul, funk, African folk music, hard bop, and avant-garde jazz and recorded one of Bartz’s first classics, I’ve Known Rivers and Other Bodies, based on the poetry of Langston Hughes. His NTU Troop recordings are often sampled by hip-hop artists.In 1997, he was awarded a Grammy Award for Best Latin Jazz Performance for his work on Roy Hargrove’s Habana album, and, in 2005, he received a Grammy Award for his work as a sideman on McCoy Tyner’s recording Illuminations. In 2015, Bartz received the BNY Mellon Jazz Living Legacy Award that honors jazz musicians from the mid-Atlantic region who have achieved distinction in performance and education.In 2019, producer Gilles Peterson invited Bartz to play the We Out Here festival with the London-based group Maisha, a move that proved so successful that Bartz played dates with them throughout Europe and cut an album with them in the Netherlands.Since 2001, Bartz has been a professor of saxophone and jazz performance at Oberlin Conservatory in Ohio. Bartz focuses his teaching on finding new ways for his students to “open their ears” and presses his Oberlin students to truly hear the music they think they know so well.Select DiscographyLibra, Milestone,1968Gary Bartz/NTU Troop, I’ve Known Rivers and Other Bodies, Fantasy/Prestige, 1973Music is My Sanctuary, Blue Note, 1977Coltrane Rules-Tao of A Music Warrior, OYO Recordings’ 2011Gary Bartz/Maisha, Night Dreamer Direct-to-Disc Sessions, Night Dreamer, 2020